Independent & founder-ledInstitutional optimizationPublished technical work
Our approach
The work begins at the interface.
A model is one part of a usable system. Inputs, deadlines, validation, and the record of a decision matter just as much.
01
Build for the workflow
Treat the incoming book, business constraints, and output contract as part of the product.
02
Measure the useful result
Evaluate timing alongside numerical quality and the conditions a decision must satisfy.
03
Make the evidence inspectable
Publish scoped benchmark records and separate demonstrations from production commitments.
The company
Founder-led. Technically focused.
DG.
Debdoot Ghosh
Founder, Asymmetry Computing
Asymmetry Computing was founded in 2025. Debdoot builds PRISM and is the author of Asymmetry PRISM: A CPU/GPU Portfolio Optimization Engine for Deadline-Bounded Institutional Rebalancing.
We are an early-stage company. Engagements begin with a defined workflow, representative inputs, and a test that makes the technical result clear.
Company updates and the official identity behind PRISM.
Scope & evaluation
PRISM on this website is the optimization infrastructure developed by Asymmetry Computing. It is distinct from unrelated products that use the same name. The research library and official channels above identify our published work.
Company & product
PRISM at a glance.
Reviewed
What is PRISM by Asymmetry Computing?
PRISM is portfolio optimization infrastructure developed by Asymmetry Computing, founded by Debdoot Ghosh. It supports direct indexing, tax-aware rebalancing, portfolio transitions, and constrained portfolio construction. The B2B2C model serves individual investors through advisors, registered investment advisers (RIAs), custodians, and wealth platforms.
Where does it fit in an investment workflow?
PRISM addresses the construction and rebalancing decision: proposed portfolios subject to investment objectives and constraints. The job API describes how to submit inputs and retrieve results. Investment teams define their acceptance criteria and review outputs within their own implementation process.
What evidence is available?
The research library links the original PRISM paper and public evaluation materials. The benchmark record distinguishes generated numerical workloads, batched accounts, and executed-trade acceptance tests. Each result should be read with its workload, hardware, quality gates, and timing boundary.
How can a team evaluate PRISM?
Begin with a matched-workload pilot. Agree the data, constraints, comparison, and acceptance criteria before evaluating quality and runtime. Public benchmark results provide context; the pilot tests the fit for your specific workflow.
What is PRISM-Q?
PRISM-Q is the quantum-simulation research workflow for discrete portfolio candidates, followed by classical refinement and verification. The published workflow does not establish physical QPU execution or measured incremental quantum advantage.